Can generative AI replace humans in qualitative research studies?

The Risky Business of Replacing Human Workers With AI

Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko via PexelsThis story was originally published on The Daily Upside. To receive cutting-edge insights into technology trends impacting CIOs and IT leaders, subscribe to our free CIO Upside newsletter.AI-powered automation is coming for enterprises. What does that mean for entry-level workers?  A recent report from SHRM found that 19.2 million U.S. jobs, or 12.6% of current employees, face a high or very high risk of di…

Can generative AI replace humans in qualitative research studies?

Having humans participate in a study can be time-consuming and expensive for researchers stretching limited budgets on strict deadlines. Sophisticated, generative large language models (LLM) can complete many tasks, so some researchers and companies have explored the idea of using them in studies instead of human participants.

Can Generative AI Replace Humans in Qualitative Research Studies?

It can be tempting to use LLM-based tools as replacements for human participants in qualitative research studies. But CMU research shows that replacing humans with LLMs has limitations and presents ethical concerns.