Supreme Court Holds that E-Rate Program Fraud Subject to the False Claims Act
6 Articles
6 Articles
Supreme Court Holds that E-Rate Program Fraud Subject to the False Claims Act
In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that a False Claims Act suit alleging E-Rate program fraud can move forward. Specifically, the Court held that the program’s reimbursement requests constitute “claims” under the FCA. Justice Kagan authored the opinion. The decision is a win for both whistleblowers and the Government alike in the fight […]
SCOTUS Unanimously Rules E-rate Payments Fall Under False Claims Act
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous but narrow opinion Friday that reimbursement requests submitted to the E-rate program, administered by the Universal Service Administrative Co., can be considered "claims" under the False Claims Act (FCA). The decision in Wisconsin...
Supreme Court Clarifies “Claim” Definition Under False Claims Act
In Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath, the Supreme Court clarified the definition of “claim” under the FCA. The case resolves a split between the Fifth and Seventh Circuits on whether a request for reimbursement under the E-Rate subsidies program meets the statutory definition of a “claim.” The Court answered that question “yes” on the narrow ground that because the government directly contributed some funds to the program, a re…
U.S. Supreme Court allows FCA suit over Education-Rate Program
In a case involving an allegation that Wisconsin Bell defrauded the federal Education Rate Program out of millions of dollars, a request for reimbursement under the program may constitute a claim for purposes of imposing civil liability under the False Claims Act, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in affirming a decision from the 7th Circuit.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage