Venerable New York Firm that Struck a Deal with Trump Is Losing Lawyers
- In March 2025, the prominent New York-based legal practice Paul, Weiss decided to end its representation of LULAC following pressure resulting from President Trump’s executive orders and related agreements.
- Trump issued executive orders targeting law firms that had investigated him, prompting Paul Weiss and eight other firms to settle by pledging tens of millions for pro bono work.
- Paul Weiss reversed its decision and committed to continuing pro bono work for LULAC, while the climate has caused firms to reconsider politically sensitive cases and limited pro bono partnerships.
- Each settlement included commitments of tens of millions of dollars—ranging from $40 million up to $125 million depending on the firm—toward pro bono initiatives addressing causes such as combating antisemitism and supporting veterans, demonstrating a notable financial dedication by the involved law firms.
- The Trump-era crackdown represents an aggressive shift reducing firms' engagement in politically sensitive legal work and eroding Big Law’s traditional pride in pro bono advocacy.
21 Articles
21 Articles
'Turmoil': Attorneys bail on prestigious law firm that caved to Trump
A venerated law firm in New York was one of many to cut a deal to change its policies at the direction of President Donald Trump — and now lawyers are quitting in droves, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.And it has "left the firm in turmoil." Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, a law firm that has operated since 1792, "already was facing troubles, including imminent attorney departures, before its April 11 deal with the White House in whi…
NY Times: 'Chilling Parallels' Between Third Reich and Trump's Second Term
David Segal, a feature writer for the New York Times, interviewed German-born novelist Daniel Kehlmann, who “sees chilling parallels between what happened [under Hitler] and what has unfolded since Trump’s second inauguration.” The “Republican president = Hitler” smear has been a tired and offensive liberal trope since the Reagan Administration, unworthy of appearing in a once-prestigious newspaper. The Times headline writer wasn’t subtle: In a …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 53% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage