Wirecard procedure: dispute over the model prosecutor

The model prosecutor in the large balance sheet scandal brings new lawyers on board, the law firm responsible to date resigns its mandate. With what strategy do Wirecard victims still have chances for damages?

In the Wirecard model procedure, there is a dispute between the lawyers. Peter Mattil, the most important representative, withdraws. This could have an impact on thousands of Wirecard shareholders.

In the KapMug case against Wirecard, the model prosecutor gets a new team of lawyers after a discord: Peter Mattil goes, two old acquaintances come in. These are the reasons behind the dispute.

The Wirecard model procedure is intended to clarify whether shareholders of the scandalous group that has disappeared in 2020 are entitled to compensation.

The main objective of the lawsuits is the auditing company EY, which tested the balance sheets of the Dax Group, which collapsed in 2020. According to a general assessment, the former Wirecard boss Markus Braun and other former managers of the insolvent payment service provider have not been able to raise much money. Model prosecutor lost half a million eurosThe first civil senate of the court selected a Hessian bank clerk who lost half a millio…

Tens of thousands of Wirecard shareholders suffered the first setback in February. Now, well-known lawyer Peter Mattil is resigning from the investor model case – after a dispute with a second model plaintiff's lawyer.